In the day since the announcement of the Nikon Df, I have given great thought to where the paths of photography and happiness cross. Being known for my lighting, it is profoundly ironic that some of my most relaxed time behind a camera is enjoying the absence of light, studying what little light exists at midnight. There is so much beauty in the light that a bright moon and low level clouds can offer you. Studios would give anything to have it, but it is one reserved for us to enjoy, not use.

The tradition started when I got my first Nikon D3 and has continued periodically throughout the years, usually when I pick up a new camera body. At first I just wanted to see what it would be like to photograph at ISO’s in excess of 6400, but I soon saw the artist merit to the imagery.


I don’t to it to try and land jobs or to decorate my walls, I do it to imagine. I think of those before me that have travelled on nights like these. Even before photography itself existed, the moonlight captivated man, whether it meant calm guidance or coming storms, for the moment that it existed, it meant beauty.


This brings me to the age old question that photographers ask… Does the camera take the pictures, or the photographer, in short, can I shoot at midnight with any of my other camera bodies? Yes. Where the critics of camera gear often get a little lost is the heavier weight of the grander story being played out. I use the Nikon Df, not because I want to capture the night, I use it because I want to be moved by it.