A warning, today’s post is strictly for photographers.
We all know my love of Nikon and all things … well … Nikon. But I don’t want this to ever jade me from appreciated true quality in a product. Read linear, if it’s a god product, I will say it’s a good product… otherwise I’m a fanboy that you’ll never get a non-biased answer out of. With that said, I have spent a lot of time with my assistants talking about Canon’s new offering, the 1D X.
-Now as a background to this subject, I actually started out shooting Canon (D30) and have shot them longer than I have shot Nikon bodies. Over the years I have shot no less than 15 Canon bodies, and 3 Nikons-
So when the 1D X was announced I, being the techie that I am, spent most of the day pouring over the specs and the pictures of it. Being as it won’t be out soon, I figured I have some time to think about whether or not to pick one up. I think the general direction that Canon is going with the camera is a strong one. The underlining thought of the new system seems to be quality over quantity (when it comes to the sensor).
One thing that I think will be interesting is how long the standard ISO measurements are used to describe cameras. Ever since the Nikon D3 brought us ISO 25,600 I found myself wondering when they would adjust the scale and/or change the name. Now with the Canon 1D X’s ISO 200 something thousand, I think that we need to find a new descriptor in this department.
The next thing that always woos me with Canon is that every chassis they produce is a gateway to shoot their primes. I have to admit that I have been spoiled by just how sharp Nikon’s zooms are and how well they handle flare. However, sometimes I long to shoot with the 85 f/1.2 again or the 35 f/1.4 (not that Nikon doesn’t offer this, but I haven’t tried it). I remember having the whole collection of lenses from Canon out of necessity because the mid-range zooms were just, well, not good.
For time’s sake, and the fact that Starbucks is calling my name, let me offer my verdict on what I believe this camera will be…
It will be great. It will be good for the people that have a solid stable of Canon lenses, and those that know the system and its menus intimately. The files should be clean (although I worry it my have Canon’s good ‘ole mosaic like pattern in the noise), and the high ISO should be impressive. But will I switch from Nikon? No. At the end of the day, I have a system that I know all the ins and outs of. I have learned how to shoot for my sensor, which is a lot easier said than done. Now don’t get me wrong, I will gladly try out the new Canon system, but I will look to what offering it inspires by Nikon.
As photographer who stands in front of a great sunset. You don’t shoot the sunset, you shoot its light hitting the person next to you.
great post, even from a Nikon guy ;). Vincent Laforet posted yesterday about the grain in the 1Dx over on his blog. He was referencing the video part but im sure it carries over. Might be worth reading just for knowledge sake
I’m wondering if this is a hint of things to come for the D4. Canon & Nikon seem to be merging their specs, notably sensor density, so I wonder what is around the corner for Nikon.
Thoughts?
“As photographer who stands in front of a great sunset. You don’t shoot the sunset, you shoot its light hitting the person next to you.”
Haa, I like that. Now to snoop through some of your photos.
See you out there,
Calvin E.
I’m still holding my Nikon D300 and if I need FX I just rent it. But some editorials ask you to bring 12Mp, so if I use a D700 and I have to crop, I’m doomed, so I think is not a good idea to buy a D700 right now.
That’s why I’m holding my great D300 with cropped sensor to buy the “D800″… But in one year I hesitated from time to time to switch to Canon and get a 5DMkII, because I’m not a fan boy I see pros and cons for each one… The problem with that Canon is that focus seems to be compromised in low light situations, something that I need.
Nice article, I think that we, as a photographers, are not helping each other creating a branding war.
Hope to see that D800 soon (and you the D4 I guess).
I agree with the whole ISo thing. It’s getting crazy but in a good way. I still use my 5D mark one. which tops out at 1600 iso, 3200 with the “High boost”
Focus on the canon in low light as far as what I have really SUcKS! I have to have someone shine a flash light on the model to get a lock on.